The Florida Insurance Law Blog
By Jeffrey T. Donner, Esq.
-
Lawyers who specialize in “first-party property insurance litigation” know that Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s corporate representatives–used by Citizens to testify both at depositions and at trial–have no personal knowledge regarding anything relevant to the case. It is not that they forgot; they never had any personal knowledge. They are never a person who was involved
-
Did your property insurance company send you a check and try to tell you that if you negotiate it, you will be accepting that amount as a final settlement of your claim? (Or, more likely, the insurance company won’t tell you that; they’ll try to sneak it into the “memo” line of the check and
-
Citizens was created by the Florida Legislature in August 2002 as a not-for-profit, tax-exempt, government entity to provide property insurance to eligible Florida property owners unable to find insurance coverage in the private market. Citizens is funded by policyholder premiums; however, Florida law also requires that Citizens levy assessments on most Florida policyholders if it
-
Section 626.854(11)(b) of the Florida Statutes provides: The statute also provides that: I recently had a judge tell me that a public adjuster’s trial testimony that the Florida Statute requires him to charge on a contingency basis–as opposed to time and expense–was incorrect. I cannot find the source of the judge’s claim. I conferred with
-
In Metropolitan Dade County v. Zapata, 601 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), the Third District considered a heart-wrenching case involving a child who drowned at Crandon Beach Park. The case gave the court the occasion to discuss the law concerning the improper “golden rule” argument. In Zapata, the jury returned a verdict in
-
On December 31, 2020, the Supreme Court of Florida, on its own motion, amended Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, adopting the federal summary judgment standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 106 S.Ct. 2505,
-
The two most common types of property insurance claims in Florida are (1) windstorm (often, but not necessarily, caused by a hurricane) and (2) damages caused by water during a plumbing leak (“a sudden and accidental discharge of water”). In these types of cases, insurance policies give the insurance company the ability to argue that
-
There is confusion in The Florida Bar and some judges concerning Florida’s recent adoption of the “Daubert” test–replacing the “Frye” test–for deciding when expert opinion evidence is admissible. In short, Daubert admitted new and novel scientific evidence that Frye would have precluded. Despite this fact, the defense bar a leapt at the opportunity to seize
-
In Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Salazar, 2023 WL 6450467 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023 – Case No. 3D20-0367), the Third District considered Citizens’ appeal of a final judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of the insured. Because the trial court erred in denying Citizens’ motion in limine, causing the homeowner’s failure to present
-
In Serrano v. Citizens Property Insurance Corp., 368 So.3d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023), the Third District considered a first-party property dispute in which the insureds appealed a final summary judgment rendered in favor of their insurer, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. The insureds filed a complaint seeking payment for a water-related loss under an all-risk
Donner Law Firm 
You must be logged in to post a comment.